Game Of Kings

Game Of Kings Screenshots

Game of Kings: The Blood Throne. Gefällt Mal. nsfwcorp.co​store/apps/details?id=nsfwcorp.co Game of Kings: The Blood Throne: nsfwcorp.co: Apps für Android. Werde der Supreme King in Game of Kings: The Blood Throne, die neueste KOSTENLOSE Echtzeitstrategie und MMO von ! Sammle deine Ressourcen​. Game of Kings Spiel portofrei bei Ex Libris kaufen. Sport & Freitzeit und viele weitere Geschenkartikel finden Sie in unseren Online-Shop. In this eagerly awaited sequel to A Game of Thrones, George R. R. Martin has created a work of unsurpassed vision, power, and imagination. A Clash of Kings​.

Game Of Kings

In this eagerly awaited sequel to A Game of Thrones, George R. R. Martin has created a work of unsurpassed vision, power, and imagination. A Clash of Kings​. Werde der Supreme King in Game of Kings: The Blood Throne, die neueste KOSTENLOSE Echtzeitstrategie und MMO von ! Sammle deine Ressourcen​. 47 Dorothy Dunnett: The Game of Kings (The Lymond Chronicles). Ein Ritter der Königsgarde versucht während des Kampfes Tyrion zu töten und verletzt ihn dabei schwer. Die Buchserie ist in einer fiktionalen Welt angesiedelt, in der die Länge Game Of Kings Sommer und Winter unvorhersehbar variiert; eine Jahreszeit kann Jahre oder Read article dauern, Frühling und Herbst hingegen sind vergleichsweise kurz. Lasst die Spiele beginnen! Familienfreigabe Wenn die Familienfreigabe aktiviert ist, können bis zu sechs Familienmitglieder diese App verwenden. Source der zweite Band der "A song of ice and fire" ist ein echtes Meisterwerk der epischen Fantasy. Genau dass was man sich vom Https://nsfwcorp.co/casino-bet-online/newest-games.php erwartet hält es. Bewertungen und Rezensionen Alle anzeigen. Winterfell wird niedergebrannt. Viel besser als Game of War ". Der Artikel wurde dem Warenkorb hinzugefügt. In der Zwischenzeit versucht Daenerys Targaryen weiterhin Verbündete zu finden, um nach Westeros zurückzukehren und die Sieben Königslande zurückzuerobern. Besonders Jojen interessiert sich für Brans merkwürdige Träume. Martin has created a click at this page of unsurpassed vision, power, and imagination. Game Of Kings Kompatibilität Erfordert iOS 8. Der dritte Teil des Epos um den Eisenthron führt die Geschichte in vielen miteinander verwobenen Handlungsträngen weiter und die Spannung nimmt von Kapitel zu Kapitel zu. Kompatibel mit iPhone, iPad und iPod touch. Hauptseite Themenportale Zufälliger Artikel. Während er gegen seine Schwester Cersei, die Witwe des letzten und Mutter des jetzigen Königs, intrigiert, arbeitet er an der Verbesserung der Click der Stadt. Einband Click to see more Seitenzahl Erscheinungsdatum Bitte melden Sie sich an, um eine Bewertung als Missbrauch zu melden.

Game Of Kings Video

Game Of Thrones - Kings 47 Dorothy Dunnett: The Game of Kings (The Lymond Chronicles). Wieder als ein Roman wurde A Clash of Kings als Game of Thrones 2: Unser ist der Zorn veröffentlicht. A Clash of Kings ist auch der Name der ersten. Includes A Game of Thrones, A Clash of Kings, A Storm of Swords, A Feast for Crows, A Dance with Dragons. New York: Bantam Books. AGOT: Martin, George​.

Game Of Kings - Navigationsmenü

Zur Kasse. Da Letztere des Mordes an Renly verdächtigt wird, flieht sie zusammen mit Catelyn. Inhalt: 1 Glas und 55 Karten Regeln auf Englisch. In den Warenkorb. Weitere Informationen zu unseren Apps finden Sie hier. He wants the Queen learn more here Scots to be the bride of his King, so that he will rule over the whole of island of Great Britain. So, to conclude, the book loses another star on account of the last points, and is left with three. Last time I stayed up with a book - to the last page of a book - was in March, with who'd have guessed? I really should've used one. Dunnett deftly weaves fictional characters in with real life personages giving us an authentic feel for this turbulent time in Scottish History. I am also someone who stays away from books with too much content of a certain type, and that was not this one. Der dritte Teil des Epos um den Eisenthron führt die Geschichte in vielen miteinander verwobenen Handlungsträngen weiter und die Spannung nimmt von Kapitel zu Kapitel zu. Bran und Rickon haben sich die ganze Zeit in der Krypta der Burg versteckt gehalten. Bewertungen und Rezensionen Alle anzeigen. Er nimmt Bran und Rickon gefangen, beide können jedoch fliehen. Die Buchserie ist in einer fiktionalen Welt angesiedelt, in der die Länge der Sommer und Winter unvorhersehbar variiert; eine Jahreszeit kann Jahre oder Jahrzehnte dauern, Frühling und Herbst hingegen sind vergleichsweise kurz. Balon Graufreud ruft sich selbst zum König der Eiseninseln aus Game Of Kings beginnt bald darauf einen massiven Angriff gegen die westliche Küste des Nordens. Stannis selbst kann knapp mit einer stark dezimierten Truppe und wenigen Schiffen entkommen. Namensräume Artikel Diskussion. Game of Kings Spiel. Ich finde das spiel sehr gut aber seit https://nsfwcorp.co/casino-bet-online/spielsucht-therapie-coburg.php tagen kann ich gar nix Moto Gp 2020 im spiel mache weil Razer Deutschland sich aufgehängt hat deswegen bitte schnell update machen und fehler click at this page

Shelves: best-loved-reads , 5-stars , exceptional-characterisation , oh-the-twists , rips-your-heart-out-and-eats-it , fantastic-swordfights , historical-fiction , historical-settings , buddy-reads , insanely-badass-moment.

You begin to see in Francis Crawford of Lymond another potential classic hero to love. But then the last pages come.

The courtroom comes. And it all goes down in a crash. One star is lost. With a caveat: that they must be believable. There is where the characterisation of Lymond fails.

Sure, there were—and are—some extraordinary souls that can leave us mere mortals with our jaws hanging low in amazement.

But they also have their darker sides. Hard to tell from the way Dunnett has described him. He feels more like an idealised Renaissance man raised exponentially to the Nth power: a Leonardo da Vinci with the handsomeness of Leonardo DiCaprio and the luck of Lucifer.

A very good one. The Middle-English quotes gave me more headaches because they were just too obscure. They are all over the place, everywhere.

If the literary references were for chapter openings or for reinforcing the chess-imagery only, then very good. At times, it even reads like Dunnett was just showing off her scholarly knowledge; there are lines that could support my point.

I felt like the characters were actors performing for an audience, they spoke like actors for an audience, and the events unfold just like in a scripted play in which the characters are the puppets moved by a master puppeteer, not events that unfold naturally and suffer the setbacks of chance and human nature.

Mummery, in sum, it felt like mummery. So, to conclude, the book loses another star on account of the last points, and is left with three only.

The book is enjoyable up to a certain extent, but definitely not for everyone. But I won't modify my initial-reaction review even though I've come to realise where I was wrong and corrected my opinion accordingly.

Yet I do think my 1st review should stay as a testament to how brilliant the author is and how she plays with readers' emotions. Besides, it will be proof that there's hope for the poor souls struggling with the 1st book so they don't give up.

Look at me, I persevered and the payoff was huge: I love Lymond and I'm almost indecently pleased that I changed my mind on this.

There's no shame in being fooled by such a smart lady! View all 41 comments. Jul 28, Rachel rated it it was amazing Shelves: historical-books , rachel-s-absolute-favorite-books.

Ever love a series of books so much that it is hard to describe just why you love them? I love Lymond. He is my all-time favorite hero.

He is fascinating. I love the language that Dunnett uses to make Lymond and the rest Ever love a series of books so much that it is hard to describe just why you love them?

I love the language that Dunnett uses to make Lymond and the rest of the characters come alive. Even their names have a ring to them.

When characters speak in foreign tongues or quote them , there is no translation. Plus there are constant references to things that I knew nothing about.

I have sucked up the sea like Charybdis and failing other entertainment will spew it three times daily, for a few.

But you need Wikipedia to puzzle it out. In particular I love his relationship with his brother, his mother, Will Scott, and the blind Christian Stewart.

I love that they each both love him and despise him. I love the accurate historical details. This is not a costume party book. I love everything about The Lymond Chronicles.

The series are by far, my most cherished books. View 1 comment. Apr 09, kailin rated it it was amazing.

I'm not going to say much here and I'm going to refer the other books in the series to this review.

This is my all time favorite series of books it goes with the Niccolo series and I don't think anything will ever even come close to topping it.

It's historical fiction at its best--accurate, well drawn, witty, intelligent, perfectly researched, and intricately designed. If you have ever wanted to live in a different time period, this is as close as you're going to get.

These are not bea Listen. These are not beach books. They are so deeply enmeshed with each other and so perfectly written that someone wrote a guide to go with them.

However, they are so worth it. If your brain and your imagination love to play, these will not disappoint.

Finally, I dare you not to fall in love with the protagonist. View all 3 comments. Shelves: scotland , fiction , historical-fiction.

My best effort at a response to this great read is to cheat and direct you to the fine reviews of Algernon and Jeffry Keeten. They covers so well its themes of betrayal and loss, love and loyalty, its stimulating mix of humor and adventure, and richness in characters and language.

Lymond is the second son of an aristocratic family but now reviled by his fellow Scots for betraying their forces to the invading British army five years earlier, resulting in tragic losses, including a sister.

Even his own brother is after his hide. At the same time, he is an enemy to the Brits for signs of double-crossing them too.

He takes up life on the run and living off banditry with a colorful cast of followers. His network of schemes and interventions is a confusing web which is subsumed under the metaphors of chess in the chapter structure.

Whether Lymond is just a justifiable scoundrel in the face of all the brutal politics and personal guilt or has a secret noble cause is unclear for much of the book.

I could tolerate such painful uncertainty because of the lively plot elements and plenty of lingering in the dialog and characters that make this such a rich and rewarding read.

The arcane lingo took some getting used to render fluid comprehension, but as with reading Shakespeare a bit of looseness of the mind helps let the meaning flow.

Unusual words and snatches of Latin and French can send you looking things up or lead you to my lazy shortcut of driving on with the context to carry the content.

Some characters show their true selves or meet their just fate, and in that way the book is a romance.

Those who meet ironic fates or stumble and bumble are part of the comedy. View all 8 comments. Aug 27, Onyx rated it it was amazing Shelves: favorite-authors , favorites , jealous-of-first-time-readers , atypical-heroes-and-heroines , historical , warriors-soldiers-assassins , tears , long-review.

Why fans of the Captive Prince should read Game of Kings. On numerous occasions, the author of the Captive Prince has cited Dorothy Dunnett as a major influence on her work.

In particular, Pacat has modeled her character Laurent on the hero of this book, Francis Crawford of Lymond. For me, for Damen , and I think for many fans, Laurent is the center of our attention.

The similarities between Lymond and Laurent are apparent. Both are fair-haired, blue-eyed second sons; both are master swordsmen, intensely loyal, and sharp-tongued leaders; both have wretched reputations which their enemies abuse in heartbreaking fashion.

If you liked watching Laurent go undercover at the inn to deliver a coded message and then make a daring escape over the rooftops, just wait until you see Lymond adopt a ridiculous alter ego and sack a castle with its own defenses.

If you got chills hearing Laurent chastise Aimeric, wait until you hear Lymond rip apart his foes with the glorious fury of his words.

If you cheered when the army marches in at the end of Vol. The style is sparse, yet jam packed with information, making this a long, involved read.

I read this book with a pen in hand, taking notes and folding pages, which I think helped. View all 10 comments. Aug 20, Misfit rated it it was amazing Shelves: read-and-keep-for-a-reread , historical-fiction.

What fun! Negotiations were made and broken to betroth young Mary to Edward and cement the two countries - or will the Scots marry her off to the dauphin of France instead?

Francis Crawford of Lymond, a disgraced nobleman accused of treason sneaks back into Scotland and thus the game begins to clear his name?

Francis and his band of "merry men" immediately begin to wreak havoc, including setting fire to his brother's estate after stealing the silver and holding the ladies including his mother at knife point for their jewelry.

Throughout, Francis' brilliant wit, sarcasm and heroism keep the reader enthralled and at times laughing out loud.

Lymond's escapades take him up and down the breadth of Scotland as Dunnett slowly peels back the layers of her story and keeps the reader guessing until the very end, finishing in a trial of ups and downs, twists and turns ala Perry Mason.

Dunnett also liberally sprinkles her text with quotes from Latin, French and Olde English, you can purchase her companion book if you must know every word and nuance but I did just fine without it -- just skip the Latin you won't miss it.

However, it's well worth the effort to stick with it until you "get it" as you will be well rewarded with a jolly good yarn, with as much action, excitement and swashbuckling good sword play as you would find in any Dumas novel -- for me that is the highest compliment I can give any author.

View all 15 comments. Poor bastard. He must've eaten the damn thing to end his suffering. You're not gonna like what I brought along to read.

The flood of high ratings has me baffled. He made the series look so appealing with his classic kissy-face poses.

View all 17 comments. Feb 16, Andy rated it it was amazing Recommends it for: everyone! Ok, I don't say this lightly but if one can make it through these books it will change your life.

I won't try to explain a series of 6 books with this review. It is an amazing historical fiction set during the 14thth century. What I can say is the effect it had on me.

The build up and release with the sixth book broke my heart. I am not a cryier. I don't cry very much, and if a movie or book brings a tear to my eye I consider it pretty moving.

When I finished the last book, I lost it. I mean c Ok, I don't say this lightly but if one can make it through these books it will change your life.

I mean complete and total crying and sobbing and weeping for an hour. Cathartic and amazing.

It truly moved me and rekindled the romantic in my heart. I don't know what else I can say other than ask me if you see me "Can I borrow it?

I hadn't done that in a while. Staying up all night with a book is a pleasure when you have the morning to sleep in, not when your alarm rings before you've read the last page and you still haven't gone to bed.

Last time I stayed up with a book - to the last page of a book - was in March, with who'd have guessed? June is a busy month I should not be spending reading fiction, which is one reason I was keeping a moderate pace with th Wow.

June is a busy month I should not be spending reading fiction, which is one reason I was keeping a moderate pace with this novel. So, assuming I had have, it's morning already lots to study, I decided to go to bed last night relatively early and read just a scene - sort of a chapter.

It didn't really work out that way. Now, the book. The best novels surprise me at every turn. I expect something to happen, or in a certain way, but what really happens is unexpected and much better.

At times I thought Lymond didn't have as good control over people as I was being led to believe.

I had two examples - Will and Mariotta. When you wind a spring too tightly, it's bound to snap eventually, and in the wrong direction.

But I was disabused of this train of thought by later appeared information and the characters' personalities.

Some characters I wished would drop dead view spoiler [Will, the crazy f--ker. He was forgiven pretty easily.

Too easy. A man died because of him and he couldn't even admit his fault. I deem him TSTL. Lymond, duh. My thoughts are not organised nor complete.

My thought process leaves a lot to be expected on zero hours sleep. View all 22 comments. Mar 19, Jane rated it it was amazing.

I did — I still do. I began to collect those books when they were out of print in this country; because I have always loved historical novels, and because the author of these historical novels was so lauded.

I have come across many readers who read and re-read her books, and I have a very clear memory of a bookish television, some years ago, where I saw an author speaking so articulately of how she and her husband would eagerly await publication of each new book, and read aloud to each other.

I was sure that I would love them, but I hesitated to start reading because there were so many thick books, because I heard they were filled with complex plots, and a wealth of abstruse literary and historical allusions.

In the end though, the arguments for reading became overwhelming. I picked up the first book, and now I can tell you that I loved it. I was captivated, I had to keep turning the pages, and it was lovely to be able to listen to someone so much cleverer than me, who was so articulate, who had so much to say about a subject that she loved, talking at very great length … The story opens in Scotland, in the s.

He wants the Queen of Scots to be the bride of his King, so that he will rule over the whole of island of Great Britain. His troops are making forays into Scotland, and some of the Lords of that country are inclined to throw their lots in with the English.

The rulers of the great European powers are watching, eager to see what will happen, and thinking how that might benefit, what they might do to steers events.

That story was sparked by the dramatic return from exile of Francis Crawford of Lymond: the younger son of a noble family, a lover of wit and game-playing, and a former galley-slave.

It gradually became clear that he was on a mission to prove himself innocent of a six-year-old charge of treason, that he believed that one of three distinguished Englishmen held the key to the success or failure of that mission, but that to have any chance of success he must avoid a great many interested parties who want to take him captive — or worse.

That plot is labyrinthine; and as I found my way through that labyrinth I saw so many different scenes, and I realised that there were so many different aspects to this story; there were twists and turns, shocks and revelations, tragedy and comedy, high drama and quiet reflection.

Some things became clear, other things remained opaque, and often it was revealed that things were not as they seemed at all.

The construction was so clever, and I loved that there were so many small details that could have slipped by unnoticed but would prove to be vitally important.

The depth and the complexity of the characterisation is extraordinary; and a cast populated by fictional characters and historical figures lived and breathed.

The world that they lived in is as well evoked; and I loved the cinematic sweep as well as perfectly framed close-ups.

There is so a wealth of detail that makes up the bigger picture, and I could see no flaw in it; everything felt real and everything felt right.

The success or failure of this book though, rested firmly on the shoulders of its central character. Francis Crawford of Lymond could be infuriating, but he had such charisma that I had to follow his story.

He is incomparable, and the nearest I can come to any sort of comparison is to say that if you can imagine that the Count of Monte Christo had not been an honest sailor but an educated, cultured player of games … It took a little time for him to grow on me.

I realised that there was a lot of back story to account for the way he chose to make his entrance, the ridiculous risks he took, the terrible antipathy between him and his elder brother; but even taking all of that into his account there were times when he struck me as juvenile and spoilt.

As the story progressed though, he seemed to become more mature, and I came to realise that his history had left him damaged and deeply troubled.

Dorothy Dunnett played fair, but oh how clever she was. The drama kept on coming, even after a dramatic shift into a courtroom, and it was only at the very end of the book that I could stop, draw breath, and realise what an extraordinary journey this book had been.

I understand now why so many people love this series of books, have read and re-read them, have written at length.

Feb 26, SamuraiKitty rated it it was amazing Shelves: favorites , historical , best-of-the-best. Back in the late 's the book was published in !!!!

Dorothy Dunnett confided to her husband that she could find nothing to read. Said husband suggested that she write a book that she herself would like to read.

Because that's what husband do - haha! Sir Alastair Dunnett, because without your suggestion there might never have been written The Game of Kings; the first book in a series of 6 books jointly referred to as the Lymond Chronicles.

In my opinion TH Back in the late 's the book was published in !!!! It is classical literature, and it is not an easy read, nor is it meant to be!

Dunnett doesn't hold your hand or make exceptions for one's lack of languages, the classics, etc. I personally have never been on a more breathtaking, awe inspiring, emotional journey while reading in my 52 years.

I have never read a series of books that each time they're re-read brings to me more detail, scope, understanding, and LAYERS of the story.

Human characters that you love, you hate, you care about; and not just the main characters, but all the characters because Dunnett makes them ALL come alive.

Then add the background. The detail of Renaissance Europe, and the Ottoman Empire which draws you in through her writing as though you, the reader are actually there experiencing it.

The best, most accurate sort of history lesson you can imagine wrapped into and around the fictional stories themselves. You are in for the literary ride of your life!

These books are wonderous, magnificent, unforgettable!!!!!! I knew absolutely nothing about the period of history this book is set in, the s in Scotland, when I first started and I was quite lost even when I was enjoying myself reading it very much.

The wit! The intrigue! The utter perfectness of Lymond! Though sometimes I felt like strangling him. I'll admit to struggling with this book at the start.

It's not an easy book to get into, I guess, with all the literary references in many languages! This book I knew absolutely nothing about the period of history this book is set in, the s in Scotland, when I first started and I was quite lost even when I was enjoying myself reading it very much.

This book abused my poor dictionary -- I swear I came across words I didn't know on every single page of this book. I gave up trying to look things up after page But I enjoyed it nonetheless.

I hear that there's a companion to the series, and it's probably worthwhile to look it up one of these days, but probably after I finish reading the series.

Mar 07, Sandra rated it it was amazing Shelves: historical , favorites. I haven't quite finished, but feel the need to write some thoughts down.

Will finish later. At first, I didn't quite know what to make of this book. It's written in a sort of antique English brogue with frequent French and old English spellings that are hard to read.

I have mostly skimmed the parts I don't understand, being basically lazy, but when something was necessary for me to understand what was being said, I used Google, the ubiquitous explainer without which I could not live.

I frequentl I haven't quite finished, but feel the need to write some thoughts down. I frequently wondered if it was worth all the effort, as it was initially very unclear where the plot was going.

The first vignette is quite promising, however, being fairly comic and interesting if convoluted As I waded through a bewildering array of scenarios and characters, I gradually became enthralled.

I am now almost finished and while reading this afternoon, I found myself responding to the story in a visceral way and realized that Ms.

Dunnett had quite magically wound the story around my emotions, pulling them out and into a great knot in my stomach as I wondered how Lymond was going to survive; knowing he would as there are five more books, my heart torn asunder by his battle with his brother, Richard.

Now, on the cusp of being finished, I am already sad that this sometimes exasperating and exhausting journey is almost at an end.

I am finished and have little to add, except the ending was most satisfactory. The hero is complicated and intelligent and the ideas and thinking are quite deep and profound.

I am quite satisfied and am extremely glad I made the effort of reading it. Now, I think I will indulge in a little lightweight fantasy of Chicagoland Vampires and when in my car or walking my dogs, will listen to A Clash of Kings.

View all 5 comments. Nov 18, Phee rated it it was amazing Shelves: read-in Top quality historical fiction.

I can honestly say that this book had me enthralled from beginning to end. Usually with a book of this size and calibre I find myself finished within a day or so.

I had tried to read this book many months ago but I really struggled with the language. He quotes ancient philosophy, plays, poems and all types of dramatic prose.

I know my limits and this was soaring above them. I still really wanted to read this story though. So I went looking for an audiobook version and found that audible were releasing a new set of Lymond Chronicles audiobooks in November.

So I waited and waited and finally I was able to read this fantastic story. The audiobook is fantastically narrated and feels very polished and authentic.

The Scottish accent sounded true and he brought the legendary Lymond to life. And he truly is legendary. A new favourite character for me, he encapsulates some of my favourite traits while being very unique.

His lightning fast wit and wicked barbed tongue bring his dramatic and theatrical speeches down on his foes like a ton of bricks.

I would hate to be on the receiving end of his verbal lashings. He is fantastically clever and the master of double dealings, feints, and secrets.

He is isolated whilst being beloved by his followers. He is condemned and judged by everyone. His despicable reputation makes all his interactions seem poised in shadow.

But there is a angelic quality to this butter haired rogue. There is a tender side, and a part of him that wants to do the right thing.

Just know that I am completely in love with the guy okay. Just know that this is a book of secrets and lies. Political intrigue is a heavy focus as is strategy and mind games.

There is a handy list of everyone at the front of the book which is very useful as there is a large cast of characters and it is a little difficult to follow who is who at some points.

Especially early on. We follow many different characters and see the plot spinning out from many different sides. I really enjoyed this aspect of the story as it made me root for pretty much all the sides at one point or another.

You never really know what Lymond has planned and he surprised me on countless occasions. I am super excited to see what is in store for our flawed hero next.

Prerequisites for this book: an extensive knowledge of 16th-century history, focusing on France, England and Scotland; a passible knowledge of French, Spanish, Latin and some Italian, or a good online translator; solid idea of chess strategies, beyond just knowing what the pieces are called; the ability to read olde tymey speling wythote going madde; and lots and lots of patience.

And a notebook. I really should've used one myself. You know when you eat something new for the first time Prerequisites for this book: an extensive knowledge of 16th-century history, focusing on France, England and Scotland; a passible knowledge of French, Spanish, Latin and some Italian, or a good online translator; solid idea of chess strategies, beyond just knowing what the pieces are called; the ability to read olde tymey speling wythote going madde; and lots and lots of patience.

You know when you eat something new for the first time and you can't tell if you like it or not, and each new bite just makes it more and more unclear?

That was me and this book. I'm giving this three stars for the author's effort that she clearly put into this. I can appreciate that amount of hard work and dedication, and I can certainly appreciate the unique flavor and structure that it gave this novel, which is quite unlike anything I've ever read before and really sets it apart from nearly every other historical novel on the market today.

It also has the single funniest scene I've read in a long while, and I'll forever mourn the medieval buddy-cop dramedy that never was.

But I just could never sink into the story. The prose was overly wordy and had shades of purple, and much of the story was told in third-person objective, so you could only guess what the characters were thinking most of the time and motivations were largely a mystery.

This was clearly done to keep the reader in the dark, but it prevented me from caring about much of what was going on. There were a few strange occurrences of third-person limited sprinkled here and there, but those only further threw me out of the story.

I liked some of the characters well enough but never felt connected to them either, so I had trouble caring one way or another what happened to them, Lymond included.

And I could never figure out if this needed more showing and less telling or more telling and less showing. It did get much easier to read as I went along.

It started out very arch and formal and slowly relaxed but not too much into a more approachable tone. The prologue was the most difficult, and if you can get through that, you should be able to make it through the rest of the book.

This is obviously a book you'd get a lot more out of it the second or third time around, but I can't see myself ever reading this again, unfortunately.

Once was most definitely enough. View all 14 comments. Jun 29, Jim rated it really liked it Shelves: bookshelf1. I have to confess that at the very beginning of this novel, I was less than impressed.

The true nature of the conflict and the motivations of the characters were well-hidden, and the reader was left somewhat puzzled as to where this story was going.

At times the same character would be referred to by his given name, by his family name, by the name of his manor, or by his title.

After this slow start, however, the re I have to confess that at the very beginning of this novel, I was less than impressed.

After this slow start, however, the reader began to be sucked into the plot. The onion analogy is somewhat overused in literary circles, but it fits this novel -- layer after layer was peeled away chapter by chapter, and the reader began to see the immense richness the plot has to offer.

The author also did a great job in encompassing us in a very believable setting that matched 16th century Scotland quite well.

From an historical fiction standpoint, Game of Kings is on a level of with the likes of Pillars of the Earth or Sarum.

Finally, the protagonist becomes a truly legendary figure -- a person who can be courteous and condescending, pugilistic and peaceful, and cunning and caring at the same time is one worthy of future exploits.

I look forward to reading the next novel in this series. Jun 30, Joy rated it really liked it Shelves: historical-fiction , british , 20c , re-read.

Historical novel set in 16th century Scotland and England later books in the series range farther afield.

Francis Crawford of Lymond returns to Scotland in despite a charge of treason hanging over his head and sets up a band of outlaws that causes havoc for forces on both sides of the English-Scottish war.

The first pages or so are a bit slow, though things get much better after that. Like Lymond himself, the book is witty, complex, and occasionally hilariously caught up in its own tragedy and angst.

Somehow it works, though; the humor makes up for a lot, and the huge cast of characters has a lot of gems Christian Stewart, the Somervilles, and Richard, for starters.

Lymond himself is in many ways the fictional descendant of Peter Wimsey and the Scarlet Pimpernel; he often infuriates me, but his story is never boring.

The slow start is less of a problem upon re-reading. First, I know it improves, and second, I can see how Dunnett sets the groundwork for later events in this book and the rest of the series.

I wish I could get more of the references one would have to be very erudite to get all of them! Have you read the reviews for this book?

It is almost universally loved. So I'm taking a different approach. Five reasons NOT to read The Game Of Kings : 1 The author is clearly looking for intelligent readers who are willing to invest a little sweat for the big payoff.

If you don't mind a little elbow grease, however, you will be well rewarded for your effort. Note: Even if you arm yourself with a decent dictionary like the one Have you read the reviews for this book?

Note: Even if you arm yourself with a decent dictionary like the one that my Nook uses you won't find all the words Ms. Dunnett knows.

If, on the other hand you are or wish you were a teacher of language skills, this book is the fulfillment of the assignment "use this word in a sentence".

Wow, what skill this author has with vocabulary! This is not high fantasy. Game of Thrones has fantasy elements, plus political double-crossing, epic war scenes, spies and intrigue, non-stop questions about who's good and who's bad, incredible settings, medieval castles, violence, honor, love, hate, death, and direwolves.

The Game of Kings doesn't have fantasy elements. Or direwolves. The rest, it has in spades. This one does that. A lot.

Of course, you can ignore it and still move right along. Or you can slog through looking it all up and find something even more clever.

I might just slog on my next reading; this time through, I mostly ignored the foreign language bits and felt smart when I could figure them out without looking them up.

They do tell you something about the characters, though - about their education, their experience, their intelligence.

There are no superfluous facts here; everything is relevant. While that makes for slow reading for me , it's rich and satisfying.

This one is all about shades of gray. Characters are deep. Some do good things for selfish motives and bad things for noble causes.

Bad guys win battles, innocents are hurt, unlikable people have happy endings, traitors get the best of two worlds. Nothing here is predictable.

In summary: engaging, but challenging. Funny, but sometimes with a just-beyond-my-grasp intelligence. I know some of my Goodreads friends would thrive in that environment.

You know who you are. But I need a break first. Oct 31, Giki rated it it was amazing Shelves: historical-fiction , best-books-ever , favorites.

Complex, confounding, mesmerising. The story opens with a man returning to his homeland from exile. Other than that we know little about him.

We have no idea what he is done or what is motivation might be but he quickly sets about causing havoc.

Breaking into noble homes in broad daylight, intimidating the occupants and stealing their valuables, even callously attacking his own mother in her home Complex, confounding, mesmerising.

Breaking into noble homes in broad daylight, intimidating the occupants and stealing their valuables, even callously attacking his own mother in her home.

He puts himself in the way of trouble,danger and appears recklessly out of control. He is cold, cruel and vindictive, he behaves appallingly when drunk and worse when he is sober.

He steals, bullies, cheats and insults, but he does it all with such style, such wit. Amongst these thrilling raids, labyrinthine political intrigue and daring escapes, the plot is slowly being teased out and we begin to realise there is more to this brutal antihero than is first apparent.

The unraveling of this complex character kept me hooked right to the end. The writing style is unashamedly dense with historical detail, the atmosphere of the period is painstakingly created.

The language is complex and difficult, littered with quotations in many languages and references to classical and early European mythology and politics.

The writer uses these to a large degree to create a distinctive voice for her main character, It is clear when he is talking, even if not made explicit in the text, by the way he uses language, as a weapon, to confuse and obscure his true purpose as well as to wound.

It often has a similar effect on the reader as on the victim reading on the kindle is useful as you are only a tap away from a Wikipedia or dictionary definition, although, often, Lynmond confounds both of these.

Once you get past this, the writing is mesmeric, it makes you slow down, it demands your focused attention, you cannot skip lightly over the pages.

It gets right inside your head. Don't be misled, though, this book is no dry historical epic, it is thoroughly entertaining.

You are never far away from a joke, something shocking, something scurrilous. Lynmond's madcap adventures rattle along with breathtaking speed.

This book is anything but dull. This is the best book I have read all year, I have never come across anything like it before.

It was exhausting but rewarding to read and I have thought of little else for the past week. Sep 05, LJ rated it it was amazing Shelves: novel , historical , scotland.

Hidden categories: Use mdy dates from January Pages using deprecated image syntax Articles needing additional references from September All articles needing additional references.

Namespaces Article Talk. Views Read Edit View history. Help Community portal Recent changes Upload file.

Download as PDF Printable version. Cards during a game of Kings. To perform a waterfall , each player starts drinking their beverage at the same time as the person to their left, starting with the player who drew the card.

No player can stop drinking until the player before them stops. The player who drew the card gives out two drinks, either both to the same person or one to two different people.

The player who drew the card takes a drink. All players put up their hands as if driving a car. The player who drew the card begins. They say "vroom" while tilting their hands to the right or left.

The "driver" is passed to the player next to them in that direction. Players now have three options as the "driver" position is passed to them.

They can choose to turn to same direction as the person before them and say "vroom", passing it one more person.

They can turn their hands in the opposite direction and say "skert" as in the screeching of car wheels and pass the "driver" position back to the person who just sent it to them.

Now that is the new direction and all "drivers" who turn that way must say "Vroom" until a "driver" decides to "skert" it back again.

The last option is to say "beep" while mimicking hitting the car horn. This passes the game's position to the player opposite the current driver.

The first "driver" who speaks or turns the wrong way has to drink. The player who drew the card chooses another player who must drink at the same time as them for the rest of the game.

The player who drew the card says a word, with players going clockwise saying words that rhyme with the original. The first person to fail to come up with a rhyming word that has not been used must drink.

The player who drew the card chooses a category, with players going clockwise to name things that fall within the category. The first person to fail to come up with something that has not been said must drink.

The player who drew the card starts by asking anyone a question. This player then asks anyone else a question.

The first player who fails to ask a question must drink. The player who drew the card becomes the question master.

Whenever they ask a question, other players must also respond with questions or otherwise drink. This continues until another Queen is drawn, at which point that player becomes the question master.

When each of the first 3 Kings are drawn, the person who drew the card puts some of their drink into the King's Cup at the center of the table.

When the 4th King is drawn, the person who drew the 4th King must drink the contents of the King's Cup. In some variations, the first three people to pick a King card can also make a rule that must be followed until the next King is picked.

Some common rules include Buffalo, must always use left hand Thumbs, player puts their thumb on the table silently, last person to do so drinks , In bed, everyone has to say "in bed" after every sentence and Teeth players can't show their teeth when they laugh.

A match of arm wrestling is played with the player sitting on the opposite side of the circle, the loser drinks.

A slap contest can also be played. Everyone has to take off one piece of clothing as fast as they can, last on to do so has to drink.

The player who had sex the most recently drinks, the second time this card is drawn the player who had sex the second most recently drinks and so on Choose a person to be your mate and they drink when you drink, and vice versa, for the rest of the game.

If one of the mates draws another 8 card they chose another player and now all three have to drink. You can also merge two mated pairs this way.

Game Of Kings

Even Lymond, when he's not trying to be mysterious or evasive, can use plain speech. And if you're willing to take on or overlook the difficult parts, there is so much in this book to love.

Lymond's adventures, as well as his problematic relationships with his brother; his second-in-command, Will Scott; a blind woman, Christian Stewart; and others make for incredible, sometimes humorous and often very exciting reading.

So, marvelous book, but minus a star for being a little too obscure and difficult and making me all irritated and surly for the first pages, until I just got over it.

Thanks so much to Marquise for the buddy read! ETA: Queens' Play , the second book in this series, is much easier to read--though still challenging--and incredibly gripping and rewarding.

So if you gave up on Dunnett after Game of Kings, I encourage you to give the second one a shot. View all 42 comments. Jun 29, Jill rated it liked it Shelves: historical-fiction.

In the hands of a less -skilled writer, this could have been a real page-turner The Game of Kings has all the ingredients to make it an irresistible read: a romantic, handsome, complex hero, an exciting historical setting and era, family drama and politics, well-researched details and vivid descriptions, intrigue and mystery.

But like the hero, Lymond, the novel itself is in turns brilliant and frustrating. Scotland, Diplomacy having failed, England has used force to bring Scotland into a In the hands of a less -skilled writer, this could have been a real page-turner The Game of Kings has all the ingredients to make it an irresistible read: a romantic, handsome, complex hero, an exciting historical setting and era, family drama and politics, well-researched details and vivid descriptions, intrigue and mystery.

Diplomacy having failed, England has used force to bring Scotland into an alliance. After five years in exile, Francis Crawford of Lymond returns to his homeland, a defiant Scotland.

We know all about Lymond. Is he come to wreak havoc with his band of outlaws? And what of the uneasy relationship with his older brother, Richard?

Or has he other, deeper motives for his return? And so begins The Game of Kings. Battle of Pinkie Cleugh Some years ago after I met and fell madly, deliriously and irrevocably in love with Jamie Fraser and the Outlander series by Diana Gabaldon, it was suggested that I go on and read The Lymond Chronicles, and that I would again fall madly, deliriously and irrevocably in love with one, Francis Crawford of Lymond.

Lymond is a true Renaissance man. He can be anything, and do everything. Musician, swordsman, master strategist, man of breeding and education, accomplished linguist, actor, lover, patriot.

Man of mystery, gifted with intelligence and good looks. And with the most amazing head for recalling obscure text and poems in any number of languages at just the right moment.

On the plus side, The Game of Kings is complex, layered and brilliantly researched. However, it is so often mired in French, Latin, Spanish and archaic English poems and texts with no translations, that it becomes a chore.

Lymond, our hero, is the worst offender: "I am a narwhal looking for my virgin. I have sucked up the sea like Charybdis and failing other entertainment will spew it three times daily, for a fee.

Tell me again, precisely, what you have just said about Mungo Tennant. Though sometimes categorised as historical romance, it isn't.

This first book is not even romantic historical fiction. The first third to half of this book is like wading through molasses in winter.

It does pick up after that. If you can stick with it, it does finally pay off. But the road to get there is often bumpy, difficult to traverse, with occasional glimmers of brilliance that help propel the reader forward.

Dorothy Dunnett is a master storyteller, and an exquisite wordsmith. A classical education, perhaps even a master's degree in English Literature and a facility with a number of languages notwithstanding, a reader is not going to fully understand or appreciate this.

This is not an easy, accessible read by any means. And this, when Lymond is posing as a palm reader although the lady knows who he is : Firmly, her wrist was taken, and the fingers spread out.

Line of life — hullo! You appear to have died at the age of seven. However, to fully appreciate this novel and series it needs to be studied.

On a second or third read, buy the guide and companions, join discussion forums, and peel back the layers of Lymond.

There is a lot to enjoy but quite frankly teasing out these pockets of bliss from amongst the other stuff is work. All in all, The Game of Kings is a very uneven read for me.

When a good quarter or a third, is totally unintelligible and seems to be there purely as a gilt-edged frame to highlight the author's masterpiece which it is However, I enjoyed The Game of Kings enough to continue the series.

View all 52 comments. Dec 28, Lightreads rated it it was amazing Shelves: fiction , historical , lgbt. This book, and how I feeeeeel about this book.

But pieces of this book are graven into me. I remembe This book, and how I feeeeeel about this book. Yet when I got to it again, it rang my whole brain like a bell because it turns out I did remember, I just remembered so far down it felt like it came from me.

Okay, some actual content. This is Scotland, , conflict sparking with England, France circling.

I love them all so much I am helpless about it. It's about the flaw, the break, the shattering, and building strength from personal anialation.

And in the last, a humanitarianism so strong, it feels brutal. Nope, definitely don't have it in me. View all 4 comments.

In order to clarify the situation with regard to said novel, let me first rehash what the two sides of the discussion have been saying : Side 'What the fuck is this' : It's obscure.

Every time Lymond opens his mouth, I want to smack his face and make him eat his weird ancient references.

Side 'This book is brilliant' : Well if you were less lazy, now. That's classics for you, lads. You have to work a little to discover the gem.

No 'cl In order to clarify the situation with regard to said novel, let me first rehash what the two sides of the discussion have been saying : Side 'What the fuck is this' : It's obscure.

No 'classic' needs to be obscure. Many aren't. That was fast, wasn't it? What, not convinced?

They're classics, but they're utterly readable. One does not need a textbook to understand every fucking page, and you know what?

It doesn't mean they're average because the 'masses' can understand them I genuinely saw people referring to the 'masses' in reviews today : are you guys for real?

It means that their authors are master of storytelling, and do not feel the need to drown their readers in ludicrous and useless literary references to get their point across.

Is it possible to go beyond their first-glance easiness and extract well-hidden references with the help of some sharp expertise?

Hell yes, or my five years in Uni would have been useless, and I can't have that. Yet first and foremost, they are stories , and the weight of references never becomes a burden the reader has to bear in order to unravel the layers and get to the fucking story.

Hence why I whole-heartedly disagree with any reader who would stamp his contempt upon me and from the great height of his pretension, dismiss me the right to call myself an intelligent reader because no, I have no intention to waste my time on Google when I should be reading, thank you very much.

I realized I should stop trying when the 'French jokes' made me readjust what exactly people referred as 'jokes'. Look, I am French.

I understand French. I am not quite bad at Latin, and I can decipher Spanish sentences if they are written and aren't too many.

At no moment did it change a thing. It's not the language I don't understand, it's the purpose I abhor.

I do not care about so-called winks and I do not believe that needing a textbook to be understood reflects some kind of superiority.

The Game of Kings reeks of pretension and everything I despise in Literary circles. Even if I could ignore my annoyance and follow the story - which I could, it didn't bode well for my love for the main character, Lymond.

I am sorry. Any man who declaims obscure French quotes while fighting annihilates any interest I could have felt for him.

The guy's a Gary Stu of epic proportions - there's literally nothing he cannot do - who loves nothing more than hearing himself talk, and I'm supposed to swoon?

Ugh, nope. And given that he is the heart of the story, excuse me if I'm slowly disengaging from this mess.

Therefore, I shall leave you all on this : by all means, entertain yourselves, but do not come at me and at other readers for being 'too lazy' and 'not clever enough'.

Dorothy Dunnett , for all her outstanding education, forgot that. I'm sure there is a splendid story hidden somewhere in the clusterfuck that is this book ; however, I do not think it's worth wasting my time.

And for all the literary warriors out there : Ab imo pectore, fuck off. For more of my reviews, please visit View all 23 comments.

Six stars out of five for Dorothy Dunnett. Fans of the author tend towards unbridled enthusiasm witness the 4,42 median rating here on Goodreads - the highest I've come across so far, and the internati Six stars out of five for Dorothy Dunnett.

Fans of the author tend towards unbridled enthusiasm witness the 4,42 median rating here on Goodreads - the highest I've come across so far, and the international conventions meeting in places of import from the books.

So what is the secret of this amazing popularity, seeing as the number of votes is relatively low? I could point out to the erudition and the word plays that rival Umberto Eco, to the wild swashbuckling adventures that surpass even Alexandre Dumas, to the intricate puzzles and whodunnit investigations that pay tribute to Arthur Conan Doyle or Agatha Christie, the grand vision, panoramic scope that challenge Gone with the Wind and War and Peace, and last but not least the wild, absurd, disruptive sense of humour that reminds me of the best of Blackadder or Monty Python 'We need to uthe thronger perthuathion.

The men below are obviouthly in colluthion too. All these aspects are part of the attraction, but I believe above and beyond the technical skills and the richness of the setting, the books of Dorothy Dunnet are about passion : for history, for the people that made history and for living life to the full.

Wikipedia mentions that the inception of the Lymond Chronicles came when Dunnett complained to her husband that she has run out of things to read, and he suggested she should write her own.

Thus we are reading the kind of tale a voracious reader wrote for her own enjoyment, and we tag along with googly eyes and mouths open in wonder.

As for the low number of votes : the books were written five decades ago, so they lack the exposure of newcomers on the scene. They are also too big for impulse buyers and too complex to be included in a school curriculum maybe at university level.

These factors combine to keep away the casual browser of library shelves, but attract the more dedicated readers of history and the ones who prefer sprawling, immersive adventures.

And once you pass the initial reluctance to invest time and effort in 13 books you end up under Dunnett spell. I wished to explore, within several books, the nature and experiences of a classical hero: a gifted leader whose star-crossed career, disturbing, hilarious, dangerous, I could follow in finest detail for ten years.

And I wished to set him in the age of the Renaissance. Enters Francis Crawford of Lymond, younger son of the Coulter family. The year is and Scotland is like 'a lark surrounded by crocodiles'.

After a series of disastrous military campaigns, most of the nobles are either dead, prisoners across the Border or secretly in the pay of the English who claim the hand of the six year old Queen Mary in marriage to their own infant heir to the throne.

At the start of the novel Francis is an outlaw, hunted across the realm for betraying his side to the English, and at the most basic level the plot can be resumed as the struggle of Francis to clear his name and discover who and how he was framed.

Complicating the issue is the deadly rivalry between Francis and his older brother, the heir to the Coulter castle and lands, his responsibility in the death of their beloved sister, a budding romance with a blind heiress and a disfunctional relationship with young and idealistic Will Scott, who wants to become an apprentice to the charysmatic outlaw leader.

The Game of Kings reflects the battle for Scottish sovereignity through the language and tactics of chess. The analogy is deeply embedded at all the levels of the story - from the opening moves of Lymond stealing his mother's jewels, burning the family castle and flirting with his brother's wife, to his game of cat and mouse playing both sides against each other and stealing equally from the British and from the Scots, to the relative role of each piece on the board - passive kings and queens, fiery knights, besieged towers, wild horse runs or bishops betrayals.

The rybauldes, players of dyce And the messangers and corrours ought to be sette tofore the rook. For hit apperteyneth to the rook Each chapter is prefaced by a reference to the game, written in old English and usually related to the current developments in the plot.

As a side note, don't get unnerved by the apparent obscurity of these introductions: the rest of the novel is written in plain English, or what Dunnett considers plain English in the context of the Renaissance: authentic Scots idiom seasoned with Latin, French, Italian, occassional German, Dutch and Spanish, verses from popular ballads and court poets, references to mythology and the equivalent of XVI century pop culture.

But I had no problem following the gist of the conversations and the more subtle putdowns or barbed arrows of irony. The book practically begs for a re-read, both for spotting the later developments as they are first introduced Lymond is always thinking and responding to his adversaries with several moves ahead of the game, like a true chess grandmaster and for taking a breather from the frantic pacing and spend some leisure time with Wikipedia and with the adnotated reference books, savouring the more obscure points of the text.

Coming back to Francis Lymond, the hero of the epic, I can understand but I cannot subscribe to the theory that he is a Gary Stu, unrealistic, uberpowerful and infallible.

Yes, he is super smart, good looking, proficient with bow and sword, well read and a musical prodigy, but he is not supposed to be an ordinary Joe or a farmboy with a secret identity and a prophecy to fulfill, he is a Renaissance man, a natural born leader, a hero of his time period.

Most of his talents can be explained by the fact that he is a second son, who inherits nothing and who has the pressing incentive to make his own place in the world, and by the circumstances forced on him: warrior, prisoner, galley slave, outlaw leader, spy, etc.

In addition to his talents, there is the way Dunnett is treating him, like a bar of iron that is heated and re-heated in the fire of adversity and then moulded into shape with sledgehammers until the sword is sharp and deadly.

This peculiar mental agility of yours has been no friend to you, has it? Without it, you might have survived, harmless, in a lukewarm limbo of drink and drugs and insipid women!

He is an actor who struggles to give up his mask and change the role Fate and the lords of the land have written for him, he tries to do right by his followers and by his friends, but more often than not the results are hurtful to guilty and innocents alike.

He makes mistakes, big ones, in keeping with his big struggles. He learns painfully that a leader is responsible for the lives of the peolpe he involves in his plans and for the unforeseen consequences of his actions.

And now where are we? It's difficult, isn't it, to know whom to trust? Fide et diffide, in fact: and that is the moral of this little story.

Be mistrustful, and you will live happy and die hated and be much more useful to me in between.

In a great supporting role is Will Scott, who wants to learn from Lymond how to lead, how to be free of family and patriotic bligations, how to control his own life.

Where Francis is practical and cynical, Will is idealistic and impulse driven. He is easily manipulated because he doesn't follow through the moves of the chess game far enough into the future.

Next is Richard Coulter, blinded in his turn by his passions, by hatred as strong as his former love of his brother.

Insufficient or false knowledge drive both Will and Richard to pit themselves against Francis and his plans in a struggle that sees a new twist and reversal of fortunes every other page.

Apparences are misleading and more than one killer may be interested in putting Francis Lymond out of the game. I could pick any of the major themes of the novel Patriotism is a fine hothouse for maggots.

It breeds intolerance , family relations, youth versus experience, law versus freedom for a more indepth analysis, but I would like to pause for a moment on the way Dunnett treated gender roles in the novel.

While men have the lion's share of the action and women are generally relegated to passive roles as childbearers and household managers, the end result is refreshingly well balanced with the ladies more than holding their own in the unravelling of the mysteries and as adept in working from the shadows as the men are at swinging their axes and swords.

Stately clan matron Sybilla Coulter, fiery Irish wife Mariotta Coulter, no-nonsense Lady Buccleuth, romantically challenged thirteen year old heiress Agnes Herries, malefic Margaret Douglas countess of Lennox, reliable and sensible Christian Stewart - they usually surpass their men in wit and fortitude.

I particularly like the way Dunnett moulded her militant feminism to the social strictures of the period and didn't try to endow her heroines with modern sensibilities.

There is friction and misunderstanding between the genders, but there are also open channels of communication and the promise of a path together, side by side into the future.

As George Douglas responds to Agnes Herries on the lack of romance in arranged marriages: It's pretty well a full-time job, these days, keeping a family housed and clothed and warm and protected.

Doesn't leave much time for poetry under the apple trees. But chivalry hasn't gone: don't think it. You'll even find it paramount still with some people, but a trifle the worse for wear, because it's not the best protection against an aggressive and materialistic world I've run out of bookmarks, and I still feel that I only touched on the surface of the story, that I didn't stress enough how wildly entertaining and how intellectually stimulating the journey was.

I've actually put off writing the review for a couple of months, hoping for inspiration to match the enthusiasm I felt reading it, but as I'm already halfway through book three of Lymond I was in danger of falling too far behind to ever reach closure.

Maybe I'll rewrite when I get around to reading the books again, this time back to back with the house of Niccolo, to see how they are related.

Until then, I'll leave you with these rambling notes. View all 16 comments. Apr 13, Katherine Arden rated it it was amazing.

Being a fan of Game of Kings—of any Dunnett novel—is a strange experience. Dunnett makes no concessions to readers.

You have to think about what you are reading. Plus, Dunnett is given to quotations in Renaissance French, Spanish, and Latin without the benefit of tran Being a fan of Game of Kings—of any Dunnett novel—is a strange experience.

Plus, Dunnett is given to quotations in Renaissance French, Spanish, and Latin without the benefit of translation which can also take you out of the flow And her hero frequently comes off as a terrible person, although he invariably has his reasons.

But if you are willing to do what the author demands, the thinking and the Latin Googling, and the adapting yourself to her style , what you get is a dazzling portrait of the High Renaissance, with an equally dazzling cast of characters at its heart.

In Game of Kings, the first book of the Lymond Chronicles, Francis Crawford of Lymond, disgraced younger son of a noble Scottish family, returns to Scotland, an outlaw, after a long absence.

With this background of turmoil, and at the head of a band of fellow outlaws, Francis will reunite with his estranged family, strike up a complex friendship with the heir to a great estate, and with his outlaws, interfere in the political workings of England and Scotland—but is he betraying his country or saving it, trying to clear his name, or just cause trouble?

It is dense, rich, distinctive, full of allusion, implication, and subtlety. Often she will imply something rather than tell the reader outright.

Her descriptions—of clothing, food, weather, are incredibly evocative. The second thing that strikes you is her hero, Francis.

But nothing is as it appears, and if you are willing to put up with Francis, the unfolding of his story—including the purpose behind his actions—will hit you like a rock to the forehead late in the game, one of those fantastic ah-ha moments that every writer hopes to give their readers.

And fortunately Francis is surrounded by a vivid and appealing supporting cast, in which one is happy to find a lot of amazing women.

Not romance in the sense of love or sex, although that plays a part. But romance in the sense of swordfights, last stands, desperate escapes, grand sacrifices, a larger-than-life hero.

Sal I started reading this book after you recommended it at a talk you gave in Bath. I really struggled through the first third. It was impenetrable at ti I started reading this book after you recommended it at a talk you gave in Bath.

It was impenetrable at times, with a central character who was hard to like, speaking in a variety of languages and quoting writers I had never heard of.

I was on the point of giving up but I stuck with it, and slowly I started to see what all the fuss was about. The ending is wonderful and I plunged straight into book 2.

Not an easy read but worth persevering with, honest! Luca I am so grateful for your recommendation of this series. Thank You really Very Much.

My mother language is not English and these books made me so prou I am so grateful for your recommendation of this series.

My mother language is not English and these books made me so proud of myself for learning it. This experience was something else.

After reading your books i knew i could trust You. Thank You again!! Mar 01, Orient rated it it was ok Shelves: br , desperado , hero , historical , killer , , psychological , on-hold.

After finishing Rise of Empire I couldn't get properly involved into reading "The Game of Kings" and it's bad, 'cause this book is really outstanding and it should keep me hooked without any additional help from Riyria or other books!

So I'm putting this book on hold for some time : Sorry guy! I promise to stalk you for yummy updates on this book ; View all 24 comments. I loved my first adventures with Lymond!

Lymond leads a group of outlaws and dissidents to defend his land, as well as his name. Lymond is the second son, and second in line for any inheritance.

Classical literature references abound, always testing me and adding fun when I actually knew one. Characters also abound, and we are on pins and needles as we wait to find out if Lymond is guilty or innocent.

Lymond is in a fight to end all fights with his brother, and the outcome will determine if Lymond dies or is welcomed back into the fold of his family.

Mary Queen of Scots is here, too, but too young to truly lead, which is why Lymond and men like him have to join up and join in to make sure Scotland remains a kingdom.

There are true-to-history characters mixed in with fictional ones. Lymond is a main character to champion: complex, foolhardy, passionate, clever, impressive.

The writing is rich and intricately detailed and is rather sumptuous overall. I received a complimentary copy.

All opinions are my own. My reviews can also be found on my blog: www. View all 9 comments. Shelves: best-loved-reads , 5-stars , exceptional-characterisation , oh-the-twists , rips-your-heart-out-and-eats-it , fantastic-swordfights , historical-fiction , historical-settings , buddy-reads , insanely-badass-moment.

You begin to see in Francis Crawford of Lymond another potential classic hero to love. But then the last pages come.

The courtroom comes. And it all goes down in a crash. One star is lost. With a caveat: that they must be believable.

There is where the characterisation of Lymond fails. Sure, there were—and are—some extraordinary souls that can leave us mere mortals with our jaws hanging low in amazement.

But they also have their darker sides. Hard to tell from the way Dunnett has described him. He feels more like an idealised Renaissance man raised exponentially to the Nth power: a Leonardo da Vinci with the handsomeness of Leonardo DiCaprio and the luck of Lucifer.

A very good one. The Middle-English quotes gave me more headaches because they were just too obscure.

They are all over the place, everywhere. If the literary references were for chapter openings or for reinforcing the chess-imagery only, then very good.

At times, it even reads like Dunnett was just showing off her scholarly knowledge; there are lines that could support my point.

I felt like the characters were actors performing for an audience, they spoke like actors for an audience, and the events unfold just like in a scripted play in which the characters are the puppets moved by a master puppeteer, not events that unfold naturally and suffer the setbacks of chance and human nature.

Mummery, in sum, it felt like mummery. So, to conclude, the book loses another star on account of the last points, and is left with three only.

The book is enjoyable up to a certain extent, but definitely not for everyone. But I won't modify my initial-reaction review even though I've come to realise where I was wrong and corrected my opinion accordingly.

Yet I do think my 1st review should stay as a testament to how brilliant the author is and how she plays with readers' emotions.

Besides, it will be proof that there's hope for the poor souls struggling with the 1st book so they don't give up. Look at me, I persevered and the payoff was huge: I love Lymond and I'm almost indecently pleased that I changed my mind on this.

There's no shame in being fooled by such a smart lady! View all 41 comments. Jul 28, Rachel rated it it was amazing Shelves: historical-books , rachel-s-absolute-favorite-books.

Ever love a series of books so much that it is hard to describe just why you love them? I love Lymond. He is my all-time favorite hero.

He is fascinating. I love the language that Dunnett uses to make Lymond and the rest Ever love a series of books so much that it is hard to describe just why you love them?

I love the language that Dunnett uses to make Lymond and the rest of the characters come alive.

Even their names have a ring to them. When characters speak in foreign tongues or quote them , there is no translation.

Plus there are constant references to things that I knew nothing about. I have sucked up the sea like Charybdis and failing other entertainment will spew it three times daily, for a few.

But you need Wikipedia to puzzle it out. In particular I love his relationship with his brother, his mother, Will Scott, and the blind Christian Stewart.

I love that they each both love him and despise him. I love the accurate historical details. This is not a costume party book.

I love everything about The Lymond Chronicles. The series are by far, my most cherished books. View 1 comment.

Apr 09, kailin rated it it was amazing. I'm not going to say much here and I'm going to refer the other books in the series to this review.

This is my all time favorite series of books it goes with the Niccolo series and I don't think anything will ever even come close to topping it.

It's historical fiction at its best--accurate, well drawn, witty, intelligent, perfectly researched, and intricately designed.

If you have ever wanted to live in a different time period, this is as close as you're going to get. These are not bea Listen. These are not beach books.

They are so deeply enmeshed with each other and so perfectly written that someone wrote a guide to go with them.

However, they are so worth it. If your brain and your imagination love to play, these will not disappoint. Finally, I dare you not to fall in love with the protagonist.

View all 3 comments. Shelves: scotland , fiction , historical-fiction. My best effort at a response to this great read is to cheat and direct you to the fine reviews of Algernon and Jeffry Keeten.

They covers so well its themes of betrayal and loss, love and loyalty, its stimulating mix of humor and adventure, and richness in characters and language.

Lymond is the second son of an aristocratic family but now reviled by his fellow Scots for betraying their forces to the invading British army five years earlier, resulting in tragic losses, including a sister.

Even his own brother is after his hide. At the same time, he is an enemy to the Brits for signs of double-crossing them too.

He takes up life on the run and living off banditry with a colorful cast of followers. His network of schemes and interventions is a confusing web which is subsumed under the metaphors of chess in the chapter structure.

Whether Lymond is just a justifiable scoundrel in the face of all the brutal politics and personal guilt or has a secret noble cause is unclear for much of the book.

I could tolerate such painful uncertainty because of the lively plot elements and plenty of lingering in the dialog and characters that make this such a rich and rewarding read.

The arcane lingo took some getting used to render fluid comprehension, but as with reading Shakespeare a bit of looseness of the mind helps let the meaning flow.

Unusual words and snatches of Latin and French can send you looking things up or lead you to my lazy shortcut of driving on with the context to carry the content.

Some characters show their true selves or meet their just fate, and in that way the book is a romance. Those who meet ironic fates or stumble and bumble are part of the comedy.

View all 8 comments. Aug 27, Onyx rated it it was amazing Shelves: favorite-authors , favorites , jealous-of-first-time-readers , atypical-heroes-and-heroines , historical , warriors-soldiers-assassins , tears , long-review.

Why fans of the Captive Prince should read Game of Kings. On numerous occasions, the author of the Captive Prince has cited Dorothy Dunnett as a major influence on her work.

In particular, Pacat has modeled her character Laurent on the hero of this book, Francis Crawford of Lymond.

For me, for Damen , and I think for many fans, Laurent is the center of our attention. The similarities between Lymond and Laurent are apparent.

Both are fair-haired, blue-eyed second sons; both are master swordsmen, intensely loyal, and sharp-tongued leaders; both have wretched reputations which their enemies abuse in heartbreaking fashion.

If you liked watching Laurent go undercover at the inn to deliver a coded message and then make a daring escape over the rooftops, just wait until you see Lymond adopt a ridiculous alter ego and sack a castle with its own defenses.

If you got chills hearing Laurent chastise Aimeric, wait until you hear Lymond rip apart his foes with the glorious fury of his words. If you cheered when the army marches in at the end of Vol.

The style is sparse, yet jam packed with information, making this a long, involved read. I read this book with a pen in hand, taking notes and folding pages, which I think helped.

View all 10 comments. Aug 20, Misfit rated it it was amazing Shelves: read-and-keep-for-a-reread , historical-fiction. What fun!

Negotiations were made and broken to betroth young Mary to Edward and cement the two countries - or will the Scots marry her off to the dauphin of France instead?

Francis Crawford of Lymond, a disgraced nobleman accused of treason sneaks back into Scotland and thus the game begins to clear his name?

Francis and his band of "merry men" immediately begin to wreak havoc, including setting fire to his brother's estate after stealing the silver and holding the ladies including his mother at knife point for their jewelry.

Throughout, Francis' brilliant wit, sarcasm and heroism keep the reader enthralled and at times laughing out loud. Lymond's escapades take him up and down the breadth of Scotland as Dunnett slowly peels back the layers of her story and keeps the reader guessing until the very end, finishing in a trial of ups and downs, twists and turns ala Perry Mason.

Dunnett also liberally sprinkles her text with quotes from Latin, French and Olde English, you can purchase her companion book if you must know every word and nuance but I did just fine without it -- just skip the Latin you won't miss it.

However, it's well worth the effort to stick with it until you "get it" as you will be well rewarded with a jolly good yarn, with as much action, excitement and swashbuckling good sword play as you would find in any Dumas novel -- for me that is the highest compliment I can give any author.

View all 15 comments. Poor bastard. He must've eaten the damn thing to end his suffering. You're not gonna like what I brought along to read.

The flood of high ratings has me baffled. He made the series look so appealing with his classic kissy-face poses. View all 17 comments.

Feb 16, Andy rated it it was amazing Recommends it for: everyone! Ok, I don't say this lightly but if one can make it through these books it will change your life.

I won't try to explain a series of 6 books with this review. It is an amazing historical fiction set during the 14thth century.

What I can say is the effect it had on me. The build up and release with the sixth book broke my heart. I am not a cryier. I don't cry very much, and if a movie or book brings a tear to my eye I consider it pretty moving.

When I finished the last book, I lost it. I mean c Ok, I don't say this lightly but if one can make it through these books it will change your life.

I mean complete and total crying and sobbing and weeping for an hour. Cathartic and amazing. It truly moved me and rekindled the romantic in my heart.

I don't know what else I can say other than ask me if you see me "Can I borrow it? I hadn't done that in a while. Staying up all night with a book is a pleasure when you have the morning to sleep in, not when your alarm rings before you've read the last page and you still haven't gone to bed.

Last time I stayed up with a book - to the last page of a book - was in March, with who'd have guessed? June is a busy month I should not be spending reading fiction, which is one reason I was keeping a moderate pace with th Wow.

June is a busy month I should not be spending reading fiction, which is one reason I was keeping a moderate pace with this novel.

So, assuming I had have, it's morning already lots to study, I decided to go to bed last night relatively early and read just a scene - sort of a chapter.

It didn't really work out that way. Now, the book. The best novels surprise me at every turn. I expect something to happen, or in a certain way, but what really happens is unexpected and much better.

At times I thought Lymond didn't have as good control over people as I was being led to believe. I had two examples - Will and Mariotta.

When you wind a spring too tightly, it's bound to snap eventually, and in the wrong direction. But I was disabused of this train of thought by later appeared information and the characters' personalities.

Some characters I wished would drop dead view spoiler [Will, the crazy f--ker. He was forgiven pretty easily. Each card value is assigned an action, which must be performed by the relevant players upon it being drawn.

Players then take turns to draw cards and participate in the relevant activity. This game is highly open ended and all of the cards can signify any mini-game, the rules and the card assignments are normally confirmed at the start of the game.

Depending on house rules , the game either ends when the last rule card has been pulled or the king's cup has been consumed. In variations where cards are placed on top of the king's cup, the game is over when the cards fall off, with the player responsible for knocking them off having to consume the king's cup.

It is also common for the players to make up and agree on a set of rules every time the game is played. Some common assignments for card values include:.

Like almost all other drinking games, Kings has endless variations of rules, and individual drinking groups usually have their own set of card effects.

There will be similar rules, but there will most likely always be some that some players have never encountered before.

Some games specify that playing a certain card allows that player to make up a new rule which lasts for the remainder of the game.

In this version, a player needs to possess a Smoko Card to leave the table to smoke or use the toilet.

A player can have multiple copies of the card and they can be traded, typically under conditions such as; the recipient must refill drinks on demand, crawl for the rest of the game, talk in a funny voice, etc.

Another popular variation in Australia is where the game is played with the addition of the Joker card. Upon drawing a Joker, the player must take a bong hit of pure good Cush.

In Belgium recently a new variation has come to the surface known as "Circle of Destruction" or "Hardcore Kings". In the beginning a pint is placed in the middle of the circle and everyone has to pour some of their drink in it, from now on this drink is referred to as "Witch's Brew".

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. For the Japanese party game, see King game. For the Danish film, see King's Game.

For the game company, see King Games. This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources.

Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. September Learn how and when to remove this template message.

Drink portal. An exploratory, categorical analysis of drinking game types". Addict Behav.

Drinking games. List of drinking games. Beer die Boat race Flip cup Quarters. Book Category. Non trick-taking card games.

Shuffling Cutting Glossary of card game terms. Kings in the Corner Golf Kings. Categories : Drinking games Drinking card games Anglo-American card games.

Hidden categories: Use mdy dates from January Pages using deprecated image syntax Articles needing additional references from September All articles needing additional references.

Namespaces Article Talk. Views Read Edit View history. Help Community portal Recent changes Upload file.

Download as PDF Printable version. Cards during a game of Kings. To perform a waterfall , each player starts drinking their beverage at the same time as the person to their left, starting with the player who drew the card.

No player can stop drinking until the player before them stops.

1 comments

Leave a Reply

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind markiert *